Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Masashi Neo concerning “Surgical treatment for atlantooccipital osteoarthritis: a case report of two patients” by H. Yoshihara et al. (2010) Eur Spine J [Epub ahead of print]

针对 Masashi Neo 编辑关于 H. Yoshihara 等人 (2010) Eur Spine J [印刷前在线发表] 的文章“寰枕骨关节炎的手术治疗:两例病例报告”的来信的答复

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Ambulation limitation is the hallmark of impairment in lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Capacity and performance have been defined as two distinct aspects of disability. Previous literature suggests that a person's walking capacity may not be reflected in their daily walking performance. PURPOSE: To examine the relationship between survey instruments, tested walking capacity, and daily ambulatory performance in people diagnosed with LSS. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Prospective laboratory and clinical observational study at a tertiary care spine clinic. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twelve subjects with LSS significant enough to be scheduled for epidural injection. OUTCOME MEASURES: Questionnaire (including the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, Oswestry Disability Index, Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey), laboratory walk testing (walking capacity), and activity monitors (community ambulation). METHODS: Subjects filled out functional questionnaires, performed a Self-Paced Walking Test (SPWT) of up to 30 minutes, and wore an Actigraph activity monitor during walking hours for 7 days. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant relationship between walking capacity (SPWT) and community ambulation per day (activity monitors), however, the maximum time of continuous activity during community ambulation had a strong relationship (r=0.63) with the SPWT. Fifteen self-report measures of ambulation were significantly correlated with the SPWT, activity monitor, or both. Of these, 13 (87%) were more highly correlated to the SPWT than the activity monitor. The SPWT had a strong relationship (r>0.60, p<.05) with global function scales but community ambulation did not. CONCLUSIONS: Walking capacity and walking performance in LSS appear to be different constructs. Survey instruments appear to reflect capacity rather than performance. This dissociation between walking capacity and walking performance has implications for the clinical management and outcomes assessment of people with LSS.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。