Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy: A Tool, Not a Necessity for Experts

人工智能在结肠镜检查中的应用:只是专家的工具,而非必需品

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:  Artificial intelligence (AI) tools for polyp detection during colonoscopy have shown promise in improving polyp detection rate (PDR) and adenoma detection rate (ADR). However, in real-world settings, the results are inconsistent, particularly among experienced endoscopists. This study evaluates the impact of AI on ADR and PDR when used by a single high-volume, experienced endoscopist. METHODS:  A retrospective analysis was conducted from July 2019 to June 2023, involving colonoscopies performed by a single high-volume endoscopist. Patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy were included, while those with diagnostic indications were excluded. Outcomes were compared between two groups: pre-AI-assisted colonoscopy (pre-AIAC) (July 2019-June 2022) and AI-assisted colonoscopy (AIAC) (July 2022-June 2023). RESULTS:  Of 1,273 colonoscopies, 814 met the inclusion criteria. Quality metrics, including the Boston Bowel Prep Score and withdrawal time greater than six minutes, were comparable between the groups. ADR was 151 (35%) in the pre-AIAC group and 116 (31%) in AIAC group, with no statistical significance (p = 0.2). Similarly, PDR, 184 (42%) vs. 145 (38%); p = 0.22, and adenomas per colonoscopy, 0.62 (1.23) vs. 0.51 (0.97); p = 0.22, showed no statistically significant differences. However, the mean withdrawal time was significantly shorter in the AIAC group (9.34 vs. 10.44 minutes; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION:  AIAC may not significantly improve adenoma or PDRs when performed by an experienced endoscopist. However, it was associated with a significant reduction in mean withdrawal time. Further research is needed to explore these findings in broader clinical settings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。