Differences between human and rodent nitric oxide production dictate susceptibility to tick-borne Rickettsia

人类和啮齿动物一氧化氮生成量的差异决定了它们对蜱传立克次体的易感性。

阅读:1

Abstract

Arthropod-borne pathogens cause serious human infections, yet they only cause limited disease in rodent reservoirs. Wild type mice resist infection by tick-borne Rickettsia parkeri, which causes spotted fever in humans, and it remains unclear why humans are vulnerable. Here, we report that whereas mouse type I interferon (IFN-I) or interferon-γ (IFN-γ) dramatically restrict R. parkeri in macrophages, human interferons do not. Differential RNA-seq revealed a significant induction of nitric oxide synthase 2 (Nos2, encoding inducible nitric oxide synthase, iNOS) in infected mouse but not human macrophages upon interferon treatment. Chemical iNOS inhibition or Nos2 deletion restored IFN-γ-mediated restriction in mouse cells. Human cells treated with cytokine cocktails or with iNOS cofactors and substrates were still unable to restrict R. parkeri. In vivo, whereas wild type mice restricted R. parkeri, infected Nos2 (-/-) mice developed mild skin eschars, recapitulating a key human disease manifestation. Together, our findings suggest that there is a threshold of NO production required to restrict R. parkeri, which mouse cells reach but human cells do not, and this is a key explanation for why humans develop tick-borne rickettsial diseases while rodents can be tolerant, asymptomatic reservoirs. Differences in NO abundance may provide an evolutionary explanation for human susceptibility to pathogens that propagate themselves in rodent reservoirs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。