Validity of the PortionSize and MyFitnessPal Smartphone Applications for Estimating Dietary Intake: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

PortionSize 和 MyFitnessPal 智能手机应用程序在估算膳食摄入量方面的有效性:一项随机交叉临床试验

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: PortionSize is a smartphone application that utilizes augmented reality and portion size templates to facilitate users' food intake estimates. MyFitnessPal is a commercial application that tracks food intake based on user's portion size estimates. Both applications provide real-time feedback on dietary intake, with PortionSize also providing feedback on intake of MyPlate food groups. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to test validity of both applications for accurately measuring food intake compared with weighed food. METHODS: In a within-subjects randomized counterbalanced design, we tested the validity of both applications for accurately measuring food intake compared with weighed food. In semicontrolled free-living settings, adults received a cooler each day that contained preweighed foods and were instructed to consume only food and beverages provided. Participants used PortionSize and MyFitnessPal during 3-d periods separated by ∼1-wk with prior training on each application. After study periods, participants completed a User Preference Survey (UPS). Two one-sided t-tests, with ±18% equivalence bounds, were used to test whether energy intake estimated with applications was statistically equivalent to weighed intake. RESULTS: The analysis sample (n = 44; 1 dropped) consisted of 55% females, with a mean (standard deviation) age of 44 y (11) y. PortionSize (P = 0.032) and MyFitnessPal (P < 0.001) energy intake (kcal) estimates were equivalent to weighed intake (mean percent error 8.0% compared with 3.7%, respectively). MyFitnessPal had a smaller relative absolute error (P < 0.001) for energy intake compared with PortionSize. PortionSize and weighed food group estimations were equivalent for protein intake (P = 0.002). Although estimates for vegetables, fruits, and dairy were not equivalent, the magnitude of error was relatively low (<0.5 cup Eq). For the UPS, 82% of participants preferred using MyFitnessPal compared with PortionSize (18%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In semicontrolled free-living settings, both applications provided equivalent energy intake estimates compared with weighed foods; however, PortionSize showed greater error for energy and lower user preference than MyFitnessPal, highlighting the need for improvements to decrease error and enhance user experience. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05166226.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。