Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle modification is essential to achieve and maintain successful outcomes after metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS). Emotions, physical states, and contextual factors are considered important determinants of maladaptive eating behavior, emphasizing their significance in understanding and addressing weight management. In this context, experience sampling methodology (ESM) offers promise for measuring lifestyle and behavior in the patient's natural environment. Nevertheless, there is limited research on its feasibility and association among emotions and problematic eating behavior within the population after MBS. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the feasibility of ESM in the population after MBS regarding emotions, physical states, contextual factors, and problematic eating behavior, and to explore the temporal association among these variables. METHODS: An experience sampling study was conducted in which participants rated their current affect (positive and negative), physical states (disgust, boredom, fatigue, and hunger), contextual factors (where, with whom, and doing what), and problematic eating behavior (ie, grazing, dietary relapse, craving, and binge eating) via smartphone-based ESM questionnaires at 6 semirandom times daily for 14 consecutive days. Feasibility was operationalized as the study's participation rate and completion rate, compliance in answering ESM questionnaires, and response rates per day. At the end of the study period, patients reflected on the feasibility of ESM in semistructured interviews. Generalized estimation equations were conducted to examine the temporal association between emotions, physical states, contextual factors, and problematic eating behavior. RESULTS: In total, 25 out of 242 participants consented to participate, resulting in a study participation rate of 10.3%. The completion rate was 83%. Overall compliance was 57.4% (1072/1868), varying from 13% (11/84) to 89% (75/84) per participant. Total response rates per day decreased from 65% (90/138) to 52% (67/130) over the 14-day study period. According to the interviews, ESM was considered feasible and of added value. Temporal associations were found for hunger and craving (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.07; P=.03), and for positive affect and grazing (odds ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.03-2.51; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, patients after MBS were not amenable to participate. Only a small number of patients were willing to participate. However, those who participated found it feasible and expressed satisfaction with it. Temporal associations were identified between hunger and craving, as well as between positive affect and grazing. However, no clear patterns were observed among emotions, physical states, context, and problematic eating behaviors.