Comparison of the effectiveness of different scoring systems and biochemical markers in determining the severity and complications of acute pancreatitis

比较不同评分系统和生化标志物在确定急性胰腺炎严重程度和并发症方面的有效性

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The aim of the study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of different scoring systems and inflammatory markers in predicting the severity, local complications, pancreatic necrosis, and mortality of acute pancreatitis (AP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 357 patients whom the severity of pancreatitis was classified according to the Revised Atlanta Classification System diagnosed with AP were retrospectively examined. Also The APACHE II, BISAP, mCTSI, and Ranson scores of all patients were calculated. After determining the cut-off values for scoring systems and inflammatory markers with ROC analysis, comparison for AP severity, local complication, necrosis, and mortality. RESULTS: In the study, 2.8% of patients had severe pancreatitis. It was found that the risk of developing local complications increased 2.82 times in cases with an 48(th)-h CRP value >192 mg/L compared to those below this threshold, and 48.96 times in cases with an mCTSI score >2 compared to ≤ 2 cases. It was found that having a Ranson score >4 increased the risk of mortality by 9.07 times compared to having a score of ≤4 (p = 0.038). It was observed that having a BISAP >2 increased the risk of severe AP by 11.79 times compared to ≤2. In cases where the 48(th)-h NLR value was >13.33, the risk of severe AP was found to have increased by 5.85 times. CONCLUSION: Although the superiority of scoring systems could not be demonstrated in our study, CRP and MCTSI for local complications, BISAP for severity and Ranson score for mortality were the determining variables.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。