Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early closed reduction and immobilization are essential in managing unstable ankle fractures to mitigate soft tissue swelling prior to surgery. This retrospective, single-center, preliminary study compares the effect of two reduction maintenance techniques, plaster U-splinting and Quigley's skin traction suspension, on time to surgery. METHODS: A retrospective observational review was conducted on 54 patients (aged 18-65) with unstable ankle fractures (Weber B/C). Surgical timing served as the dependent variable; reduction technique and patient variables were independent variables. Both Bayesian estimation and frequentist methods, including t tests and correlation analyses, were employed. RESULTS: Patients treated with Quigley's skin traction experienced shorter median times to surgery (5.3 days, SD = 2.8) compared to the U-splint group (10.7 days, SD = 3.9). This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Bayesian analysis (posterior mean difference: 5.4 days, 95% CrI: 3.2-7.5; Bayes Factor = 12.6) supported these findings. However, patients in traction were hospitalized throughout, introducing inherent bias. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that the inpatient use of Quigley's technique, likely through continuous elevation and regular monitoring, was associated with shorter time to surgery, though causality cannot be established due to confounding. This advantage must be weighed against the costs of hospitalization and potential complications. More extensive, prospective studies with standardized follow-up and complication reporting are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.