Abstract
Peripheral blood pressure (PBP) is used as a substitute for central blood pressure (CBP) because it is more accessible and less invasive, but in certain conditions like porcelain aorta, it may fail to accurately represent true hemodynamics. Porcelain aorta, characterized by extensive calcification of the aortic arch, can lead to significant discrepancies between PBP and CBP leading to challenges in diagnoses and management. We report a case of an 80-year-old male individual with porcelain aorta, found to have a greater than 100 mmHg difference in systolic PBP and CBP, who presented with recurrent admissions for hypotension despite an absence of organ dysfunction. This case highlights the need to be aware and account for CBP measurements in patients with extensive vascular calcifications to guide appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic decisions.