To Determine the Efficacy of the Modified Shock Index in Predicting the Need for Blood Transfusions in Patients With Multiple Injuries

确定改良休克指数在预测多发伤患者输血需求方面的有效性

阅读:2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Excessive blood loss remains a major cause of early mortality in trauma patients. Prompt recognition of circulatory failure is crucial for initiating life-saving interventions. However, standard clinical signs, such as heart rate and blood pressure, often remain within normal limits during the initial compensatory phase, thereby masking the early signs of shock. The Shock Index (SI), which is the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure, is widely used to evaluate cardiovascular status; however, it may not accurately reflect tissue perfusion. To improve sensitivity, the Modified Shock Index (MSI) replaces systolic pressure with mean arterial pressure, offering a potentially more accurate measure of hemodynamic compromise. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the predictive value of MSI for early blood transfusion requirements in polytrauma patients and to evaluate its association with adverse outcomes, including ICU admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality. METHODS: This prospective observational study evaluated MSI as a predictor of transfusion requirements and clinical outcomes in 63 polytrauma patients. MSI was calculated at admission, and outcomes, including transfusion >1500 mL, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and mortality, were recorded. RESULTS: The mean MSI at admission was significantly higher in patients who required transfusion volumes greater than 1500 mL. An MSI >1.4 predicted massive transfusions with an AUROC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.890, a sensitivity of 82.5%, and a specificity of 95.65%. Multivariate analysis confirmed MSI > 1.3 as an independent predictor of high transfusion needs (AOR 67.20; p < 0.001). Higher MSI also correlated with adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: The MSI may serve as a simple, non-invasive bedside tool with potential value for early risk stratification in trauma patients. However, given the single-center observational design of this study, these findings demonstrate association rather than causation, and further multicenter studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and support the integration of MSI thresholds into standardized trauma management guidelines.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。