Clinical characteristics of asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap phenotypes

哮喘-慢性阻塞性肺疾病的临床特征存在表型重叠

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO) patients are categorized as those with persistent airflow limitation and features of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). AIM: This study aimed to identify ACO subgroups based on atopy, bronchodilator response (BDR), and eosinophil count. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2021 to 2024, we conducted a retrospective study on patients with asthma and/or COPD who underwent BDR testing. An ACO diagnosis required persistent airflow limitation, a history of asthma before the age of 40 or significant BDR, and at least one minor criterion. Patients were grouped by atopy status, BDR presence, and eosinophil count. We compared demographic, laboratory, spirometry, and medication data across subgroups. RESULTS: The study included 109 ACO patients with a mean age of 49.5 ±10.7 years. Atopic ACO patients showed a higher increase in FEV(1) after inhalation of 400 µg of salbutamol or the equivalent (ΔFEV(1)BDR) and higher total IgE levels than non-atopic patients (200 ml vs. 100 ml, p = 0.034; 211 IU/ml vs. 60 IU/ml, p = 0.002). Eosinophil counts were higher in the BDR-positive group (360/µl vs. 195/µl, p = 0.047). High eosinophilic ACO patients also had elevated IgE levels (323 IU/ml vs. 80 IU/ml, p = 0.001). BDR-positive and eosinophilic groups demonstrated better spirometric results. Atopic ACO patients used more leukotriene receptor antagonists, while BDR-negative ACO patients used antimuscarinics. CONCLUSIONS: Higher ΔFEV(1)BDR in atopic ACO indicates they may respond better to bronchodilators. Elevated eosinophil counts in BDR-positive patients support their classification and suggest less severe disease progression.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。