Efficacy and Safety of Metastatic Directed Treatment of Oligometastatic Disease: Results of a Meta-analysis

转移性靶向治疗寡转移性疾病的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析的结果

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: In patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD), local therapy to metastatic sites has gained acceptance despite uncertainty regarding its long-term benefits or whether some subgroups would benefit more than others. Here, we report a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding stereotactic radiation to metastases versus the standard of care (SOC) in treating OMD. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A meta-analysis was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were identified from Medline and Embase databases from inception to July 16, 2024. The inclusion criteria comprised RCTs involving adults with oligometastatic solid tumors receiving metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) compared to SOC alone. OMD was divided into 4 groups according to the time of intervention: upfront therapy, consolidation therapy, unselected and oligoprogression. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to new lesion (TNL), and treatment toxicity. Hazard ratios (HR) for PFS, OS, and TNL were extracted. Odd ratios (ORs) were calculated for adverse events grade 3 or higher. Data were analyzed using random effects models, with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: Fifteen RCTs comprising 1414 patients were included. MDT significantly improved PFS [HR: 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.54, P < .01] and OS (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.49-0.75; P < .001) compared to SOC. Subgroup analysis revealed a consistent benefit in nonmutated non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), prostate, and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC, but not in breast cancer. The benefits of MDT were significant across all intervention points: upfront, consolidation, and unselected. No significant benefit was observed in oligoprogressive disease (HR, 0.69; P = .11). MDT did not prolong the TNL compared to SOC (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.62-1.08; P = .15). MDT was associated with a higher odds of adverse events (odd ratio: 1.46, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: MDT provides significant improvement in PFS and OS, though these effects were not observed in breast cancer or in oligoprogressive disease.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。