Rising Trends and Safety of Outpatient Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity-Matched National Analysis

门诊机器人辅助部分肾切除术的增长趋势及安全性:一项倾向性匹配的全国性分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Introduction Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN), laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN), is the preferred treatment for T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC). As outpatient surgery expands across urology, its safety and feasibility in oncologic procedures, like MIPN and especially RPN, remain underexplored. Methods Using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) data (2022-2023), we identified 8,927 adult patients who underwent RPN. Trends in outpatient MIPN, both laparoscopic and robotic approaches, were observed from 2019 to 2023. Patients who underwent RPN were then categorized by inpatient or outpatient setting. Propensity score matching was applied to balance demographic and clinical variables. Postoperative complications and readmissions were compared, and multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of adverse outcomes such as 30-day infectious complications, reoperations, and readmissions. Results Outpatient MIPN increased from 20.8% (n = 884) in 2019 to 35.5% (n = 1827) in 2023. After matching, 3,180 inpatient and 3,185 outpatient cases of RPN were analyzed. With the current patient selection criteria, outpatient RPN was associated with significantly lower rates of pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, septic shock, blood transfusions, reoperation, and readmissions. Logistic regression identified inpatient setting as an independent predictor of infectious complications (odds ratio (OR): 1.31), reoperation (OR: 1.92), and readmission (OR: 1.23). While outpatient surgery was associated with lower complication rates, this likely reflects the selection of healthier patients for ambulatory care rather than an intrinsic advantage of the outpatient setting. Conclusion Outpatient MIPN is increasingly utilized, and RPN demonstrates non-inferior safety compared to inpatient procedures in appropriately selected patients. However, disparities in access and limitations in surgical and oncologic data warrant further investigation. These findings support the safe expansion of outpatient RPN, emphasizing the need for standardized protocols, equitable access, and future research into long-term outcomes and individualized risk stratification.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。