Perioperative prevention of venous thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparin versus rivaroxaban in elderly patients with hip fractures: A retrospective controlled study

低分子肝素与利伐沙班在老年髋部骨折患者围手术期预防静脉血栓形成中的疗效比较:一项回顾性对照研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Elderly patients with hip fractures are at significantly increased risk of perioperative venous thromboembolism due to multiple comorbidities, functional decline, and prolonged immobilization. Balancing effective thromboprophylaxis with minimizing bleeding risk and improving adherence remains a core challenge in clinical management. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is the conventional prophylactic agent, but its injectable administration often results in poor compliance. Rivaroxaban, an oral factor Xa inhibitor, has shown promise; however, clinical evidence in elderly populations remains insufficient. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus LMWH in elderly patients with hip fractures during the perioperative period. A total of 100 elderly hip fracture patients admitted between January 2022 and January 2025 were enrolled and assigned to either the LMWH group (n = 50) or the rivaroxaban group (n = 50). Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate, comorbidities, and surgical methods, showed no significant differences between groups (P > .05). Perioperative outcomes compared included incidence of venous thrombosis, bleeding complications, mortality, medication adherence, and postoperative recovery. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group compared with the LMWH group (4.0% vs 10.0%, P = .03), with a higher thrombosis-free survival rate confirmed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The overall bleeding event rate was comparable (8.0% vs 6.0%, P = .75), with no severe bleeding in either group. Thirty-day mortality was low in both groups without significant difference (4.0% vs 2.0%, P = .69). Rivaroxaban demonstrated slightly better adherence (nonadherence rate 2.0% vs 6.0%, P = .12). Postoperative recovery was more favorable in the rivaroxaban group, with shorter hospital stay (9.2 ± 2.3 vs 10.1 ± 2.5 days, P = .04) and earlier 1st ambulation (3.8 ± 1.2 vs 4.4 ± 1.3 days, P = .036), while wound healing time did not differ significantly. Rivaroxaban provides superior antithrombotic efficacy compared with LMWH in elderly hip fracture patients during the perioperative period, with comparable safety, better treatment adherence, and enhanced postoperative recovery. These findings suggest rivaroxaban may represent a preferred prophylactic option in this high-risk population, although larger multicenter trials with longer follow-up are warranted to validate its clinical utility.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。