Cumulative live birth rate and perinatal outcomes of blastocyst versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer: A propensity score matching analysis

囊胚期与卵裂期胚胎移植的累积活产率和围产期结局:倾向评分匹配分析

阅读:1

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of different transfer strategies (blastocyst vs cleavage-stage embryo) on the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) and perinatal outcomes. In this propensity score matching (PSM) study, we evaluated the clinical data of 683 oocyte retrieval cycles performed using in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) from June 2017 to December 2022. The primary outcome was CLBR. Secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, implantation, live birth, multiple pregnancy, abortion (<28 weeks), ectopic pregnancy, preterm birth (<37 weeks), stillbirth, pregnancy complications, gestational age, birth weight, sex ratio, and birth defects in newborns. After PSM, compared to the cleavage-stage embryo transfer group in fresh embryo transfer cycles, the number of embryos transferred was lower, implantation rate was higher, and multiple pregnancy rate was lower in the blastocyst transfer group. In frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, the number of embryos transferred was lower, and clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate were higher in the blastocyst transfer group. The CLBR was higher, and the multiple pregnancy rate was lower in the blastocyst transfer group. There was no statistically significant difference in perinatal outcomes between the 2 groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that CLBR was positively affected by the number of frozen embryos, and blastocyst transfer increased the CLBR. We conclude that blastocyst transfer is beneficial for improving CLBR and reducing multiple pregnancy rate.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。