Comparison of Different Indices of Liver Disease Severity in Predicting Outcomes Following Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt

比较不同肝病严重程度指标在预测经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后预后中的作用

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Careful patient selection is crucial to prevent liver failure due to hepatic blood flow shunting after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). This study compares the predictive abilities of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) 3.0, and Child-Pugh scores in TIPS patients with refractory ascites or variceal hemorrhage, focusing on mortality, ascites control, rebleeding, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and sarcopenia's role in post-TIPS mortality. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients undergoing TIPS at the Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences from 2013 to 2021. Exclusion criteria included incomplete data, inadequate follow-up, prior liver transplantation, or portal hypertension-related surgeries. After exclusions, 198 patients were analyzed. Pre-procedural and post-procedural data from medical records were used to calculate MELD-Na, MELD 3.0, and Child-Pugh scores. Outcomes, including 90-day and 30-day mortality, ascites control, rebleeding, HE at 1 and 3 months, and sarcopenia's association with 90-day mortality, were assessed over 5 years. RESULTS: Overall 90-day mortality was 15.7% (31/198). MELD 3.0 showed slightly higher predictive accuracy than MELD-Na and Child-Pugh scores. For 30-day mortality (8%, 16/198), MELD 3.0 demonstrated statistical superiority over MELD-Na and Child-Pugh scores. Secondary outcomes over 5 years indicated MELD-Na and MELD 3.0 scores were more discriminative for short- to medium-term ascites control and rebleeding. HE incidence rose from 11% (1 month) to 14% (3 months), with Child-Pugh score as the strongest predictor. Sarcopenia significantly elevated 90-day mortality risk, with 26% mortality in sarcopenic versus 13% in non-sarcopenic patients. CONCLUSION: MELD 3.0 offers a slight, non-significant improvement in 90-day mortality prediction over MELD-Na (P > 0.05) but significantly outperforms both in 30-day mortality (P = 0.05 vs. MELD-Na, P = 0.04 vs. Child-Pugh). MELD-Na and MELD 3.0 scores excel in predicting short- to medium-term outcomes, while Child-Pugh score predicts HE, and sarcopenia is a key mortality risk factor. A multi-faceted risk assessment is recommended to optimize TIPS patient management.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。