Abstract
Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) devices can impair coronary access, there are limited real-world data comparing outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in post-TAVR versus non-TAVR patients. In this study, we compare procedural characteristics and outcomes between patients with versus without a history of TAVR who undergo PCI. We used claims data for the Medicare population to evaluate the incidence of PCI after TAVR between 2011 and 2017. Then, using the CathPCI Registry, we compared PCI outcomes between patients with a history of TAVR versus propensity score-matched non-TAVR patients. Of the 52,780 Medicare patients who underwent TAVR between 2011 and 2017, the incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was 10.2% and of PCI was 5.1% at 5 years. At 5 years, the incidence of stroke was 5.0% and of death was 64.0%. In the CathPCI Registry, procedural success for PCI was similar between 1,309 post-TAVR patients versus 5,236 propensity-score matched patients without prior TAVR. However, post-TAVR patients required greater fluoroscopic time (21.9 vs 17.7 minutes, p <0.001) and had higher rates of post-procedural stroke (0.8% vs 0.4%, p = 0.02) and bleeding (5.1% vs 2.9%, p <0.001). Post-TAVR patients were more likely to have repeat PCI in the 3 years post-PCI (HR: 1.36, 95% C.I: 1.09, 1.70) and had higher rates of stroke (HR: 1.65, C.I.: 1.07 to 2.56, p = 0.023) and death (HR: 1.23, C.I.: 1.11-1.38, p <0.001) compared to non-TAVR patients. In conclusion, in the CathPCI Registry, patients with a history of TAVR appeared to have similar procedural success but longer fluoroscopic times, more frequent post-procedural bleeding and stroke, and a higher likelihood of a repeat PCI compared with matched patients without a history of TAVR.