Abstract
Hemostatic biomaterial agents are widely used during surgery and trauma care to control bleeding, yet their effects on wound healing remain incompletely understood. This study evaluated the impact of oxidized non-regenerated cellulose (ONRC), oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC), and a gelatin-based hemostat (GELA) on wound healing at 14 and 30 days in a mouse model. Full-thickness wounds were created in C57BL/6J mice (n = 192) and compared to sham controls. Tissue samples were analyzed histologically, supported by immunohistochemistry for Ki-67 and α-SMA and qPCR for VEGF, TGF-β, and FGF-2. Histology demonstrated preserved tissue architecture across groups with progressive resorption of cellulose-based materials, whereas GELA showed localized fibrous structures and enhanced extracellular matrix formation. At day 14, no significant differences were observed in proliferation, contraction, VEGF, or FGF-2 expression; however, TGF-β was significantly reduced in the ORC group. By day 30, GELA significantly increased epidermal proliferation, while contraction markers were elevated in both GELA and ORC. VEGF expression was reduced in GELA and ORC, whereas ONRC showed increased TGF-β expression. FGF-2 remained unchanged across groups. All investigated hemostatic materials were well tolerated during the early postoperative phase (up to day 14), indicating short-term biocompatibility within the scope of this model. In contrast, material-specific differences in cellular activity and growth factor expression became apparent during the later remodeling phase (day 30). These findings suggest differential effects on cellular and molecular aspects of tissue remodeling; however, no conclusions can be drawn regarding overall healing quality or clinical safety, as no quantitative macroscopic or functional outcome measures were assessed.