Assessing the correlation between vastus medialis obliquus cross-sectional area and patellofemoral instability: a comparative magnetic resonance imaging study

评估股内侧斜肌横截面积与髌股关节不稳定性之间的相关性:一项比较磁共振成像研究

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the relationship between the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) cross-sectional area (CSA) and patellofemoral instability (PFI) in both primary and recurrent lateral patellar dislocations (LPD). Our secondary objective was to examine associations between VMO CSA and trochlear dysplasia, tibial tuberosity position, and patellar height in patients with PFI. METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiographs were retrospectively analysed for 90 patients with primary acute LPD, 90 patients with recurrent LPD, and 56 patients without LPD (control). Measurements of the CSA ratio of the VMO to the whole thigh in three transverse slices were performed to calculate a mean ratio per patient. Additionally, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patellar tilt angle (PTA), trochlear sulcus angle (TSA), and Insall-Salvati ratio (ISR) were measured as part of the Dejour Protocol. RESULTS: The median CSA ratios in primary (0.04, standard deviation [SD]: 0.02) and recurrent (0.04, SD: 0.02) LPD patients were significantly lower than those in the control group (0.07, SD: 0.02) (P < 0.05). Compared with the primary LPD group, the recurrent LPD group presented significantly greater TT-TG distances (16.0, SD: 4.77 mm vs. 13.0, SD: 4.73 mm; p = 0.0101) and PTA (25, SD: 9.79 degrees vs. 19, SD: 15.76 degrees; p = 0.0071). There was no statistically significant correlation between any parameters of the Dejour Protocol and the VMO CSA ratio in patients with primary or recurrent dislocations (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with both primary and recurrent LPD demonstrated smaller VMO bulk relative to the rest of the thigh compared with controls. These findings indicate an association between reduced VMO size and patellar dislocation; however, causality cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional analysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。