Can mechanical load and physiological intensity during gymnastics training explain physical adaptations? an observational study

体操训练中的机械负荷和生理强度能否解释身体适应性变化?一项观察性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

This study analyzed the relationships between physiological and mechanical training loads and subsequent physical strength and aerobic adaptations in youth gymnasts. A prospective cohort design monitored 40 local-level female artistic gymnasts (16.5 ± 1.1 years) over a 12-week preparatory training phase. Strength (Isometric Mid-Thigh Pull [IMTP], Countermovement Jump [CMJ]) and aerobic fitness (Multistage Aerobic Fitness Test by Luc Léger [MSAFT]) were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Training load was continuously monitored via heart rate (TRIMP), mechanical load (jumps), and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). Significant improvements were observed across all fitness parameters: IMTP (19.2%), CMJ (2.7%), and MSAFT (8.6%), all with large effect sizes (p < 0.001). Mean session loads averaged RPE 7.25 ± 0.732, TRIMP 290.45 ± 30.343, and 105.18 ± 27.547 jumps. Jump volume significantly correlated with improvements in IMTP (r = 0.478, p = 0.002) and CMJ (r = 0.785, p < 0.001), indicating its large association with strength improvement. Conversely, RPE (r = 0.775, p < 0.001) and TRIMP (r = 0.872, p < 0.001) were largely correlated with enhanced aerobic fitness. This study showed that physiological training loads are important for aerobic adaptations, while mechanical loads, particularly jumps, drive strength and power improvements in youth gymnasts. Therefore, monitoring strategies that integrate both internal and external load parameters is essential for optimizing specific physical qualities in gymnasts.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。