Abstract
Background and Objectives: Extensive research has demonstrated that various approaches to the quadratus lumborum (QL) block offer superior postoperative analgesia compared to the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, particularly in reducing opioid consumption. This study aims to compare postoperative analgesia between the blocks in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with elective colorectal surgeries who received bilateral US TAP blocks in the supine position or US anterior QL block in the lateral position at the end of the surgery and before extubating, with Ropivacaine 0.25%. Total opioid consumption and time to first intravenous analgesic were noted. Results: Between January 2020 and December 2024, 410 patients underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal oncology surgery under general anesthesia, with peripheral nerve blocks. Of these, we analyzed 116 patients with localized diseases who underwent elective surgeries and who did not require conversion to classical surgery and received either QL or TAP blocks. A total of 62 patients underwent QL block and 54 received TAP block. For the primary outcome, in the QL group, significantly fewer opioids were used than in the TAP group (p < 0.001), and time to first rescue analgesic was prolonged in the QL group at 16 h (IQR 14-18) compared to the TAP group, where the requirement occurred earlier at 8 h (IQR 8-8) postoperatively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Postoperative bilateral US anterior QL block reduced morphine consumption and improved time to rescue analgesia and LOS compared with midaxillary line bilateral US TAP block.