Comparative evaluation of three automated urine sediment analyzers excluding cutoff-related trade-offs

排除阈值相关权衡因素,对三种自动尿沉渣分析仪进行比较评价

阅读:1

Abstract

Performance comparison of automated urine sediment analyzers is difficult due to cutoff-related trade-offs. In this study, we evaluated and compared UF-5000, UAS800, and Cobas u701 using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A total of 774 urine samples were analyzed using manual microscopic examination and microbial culture as the reference test. The area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC) was compared using DeLong's test. UF-5000, a flow cytometry analyzer, demonstrated significantly better performance than both the automated imaging analyzers UAS800 and Cobas u701 for detecting significant bacteriuria or mucous thread. However, its performance was significantly worse for detecting crystals. UAS800 and Cobas u701 showed generally similar performance, but with significant differences for detecting red blood cells, sperm, and significant bacteriuria. Our results highlight the operating mechanism as a key determinant of performance, and also show that analyzers with similar operating mechanisms can still have significant differences in their performance.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。