Survival Modeling Using Deep Learning, Machine Learning, and Statistical Methods: A Comparative Analysis for Predicting Mortality After Hospital Admission

利用深度学习、机器学习和统计方法进行生存建模:预测入院后死亡率的比较分析

阅读:1

Abstract

Background: Survival analysis is essential for studying time-to-event outcomes and providing a dynamic understanding of the probability of an event occurring over time. Various survival analysis techniques, from traditional statistical models to state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms, support healthcare intervention and policy decisions. However, there remains ongoing discussion about their comparative performance. Methods: We conducted a comparative study of several survival analysis methods, including the accelerated failure time, Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH), stepwise CoxPH, elastic net penalized Cox model, random survival forests, gradient boosting machine learning, AutoScore-Survival, DeepSurv, time-dependent Cox model based on neural network, and DeepHit survival neural network. We applied the concordance index (C-index) for model discrimination, and the integrated Brier scores (IBSs) for calibration, and considered the model interpretability. The prediction performance was independently evaluated in the inpatient dataset of Singapore General Hospital (SGH) from 2017 to 2019 and Asian patients from the MIMIC-IV Clinical Database (MIMIC-IV). The outcome was to predict 90-d all-cause mortality based on patient demographics, clinicopathological features, and historical data. Results: The results of the C-index indicate that deep learning achieved comparable performance, with DeepSurv producing the best discrimination in both SGH (C-index: 0.893) and MIMIC-IV (C-index: 0.794). The calibration of DeepSurv also performed the best, with the IBS of 0.0406 in SGH and 0.1473 in MIMIC-IV, all using the full variables. Moreover, AutoScore-Survival, using a minimal variable subset, is easy to interpret and can achieve good discrimination (C-index in SGH: 0.867; MIMIC-IV: 0.788) and calibration (IBS in SGH: 0.0439; MIMIC-IV: 0.1263). Conclusion: All survival models were satisfactory in predicting mortality after hospital admission. This study provides recommendations for selection based on the characteristics of different models.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。