Accuracy of Diagnostic Codes and Algorithms Used to Identify Rheumatoid Arthritis and Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis in Administrative Claims and Electronic Health Records: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

用于识别行政索赔和电子健康记录中类风湿性关节炎和幼年特发性关节炎的诊断代码和算法的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of algorithms used to identify rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis in electronic health records. METHODS: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials databases and included studies that validated case definitions against a reference standard, such as rheumatologist-confirmed diagnosis or American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria. Title and abstract screening, full-text review, data extraction, and quality assessment were all completed in duplicate. Results were synthesized narratively and using a bivariate random-effects meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 35 studies were included. Algorithms varied widely in complexity, ranging from single International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to combinations including disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), hospitalization records, and specialist diagnosis. Algorithms combining ICD codes with DMARD prescriptions (pooled sensitivity 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.90], specificity 0.96 [95% CI 0.72-1.00], positive predictive value [PPV] 0.78 [95% CI 0.63-0.88]) or requiring an ICD code assigned by a rheumatologist (pooled sensitivity 0.91 [95% CI 0.70-0.98], specificity 0.94 [95% CI 0.49-1.00], PPV 0.70 [95% CI 0.64-0.75]) showed the highest accuracy, with balanced sensitivity, specificity, and PPV. Less restrictive algorithms demonstrated high sensitivity but lower PPV. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies, likely due to differences in algorithm structure, data sources, and validation methods. Despite this variability, we used conceptually coherent categories to allow for meaningful synthesis, prioritizing clinical interpretability. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of more specific algorithms when diagnostic certainty is essential and highlight the need for further validation of high-performing algorithms across diverse health care systems.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。