Increased Risk of Recurrence in Severe Hallux Valgus Associated With Inability to Passively Correct Deformity Prior to Surgery: A Comparative Study of Transverse vs Chevron Osteotomy Minimally Invasive Surgery Techniques

严重拇外翻患者术前无法被动矫正畸形会增加复发风险:横向截骨术与V形截骨术微创手术技术的比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal osteotomy technique for severe hallux valgus deformity using minimally invasive surgery remains unknown. This study aimed to explore the clinical and radiographic outcomes between chevron and transverse osteotomies in patients with severe hallux valgus deformity. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including 131 feet (109 patients) with complete radiographic follow-up who underwent hallux valgus correction using either percutaneous chevron and Akin osteotomy (PECA) (n = 43 patients, 50 feet) or metaphyseal extra-articular transverse and Akin osteotomy (META) (n = 66 patients, 81 feet) techniques. Radiographic parameters including hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were measured at baseline, 6 weeks, and final follow-up. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed using the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and EuroQol 5 dimension-5 level questionnaire. Recurrence was defined as a final HVA exceeding 20°. Complication rates and passive correctability were also analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for significantly higher initial IMA in the PECA group (17.8° vs 15.8°, P = .001). Both techniques achieved significant deformity correction. At final follow-up, the PECA group demonstrated a significantly lower HVA compared to the META group (11.7° vs 14.5°, P = .045), whereas final IMA measurements were similar (5.2° vs 4.9°, P = .642). Recurrence rates were significantly lower in the PECA group (10.0% [95% CI: 4.3%-21.4%] vs 27.2% [95% CI: 18.7%-37.7%], P = .025). Pre-operative passive correctability was significantly higher in the PECA group (68.0% vs 46.9%, P = .020), particularly amongst recurrent cases (80.0% vs 27.3%, P = .047). No significant differences were observed in MOXFQ scores between groups, although VAS pain favored the META group (6.2 [SD 12.3] vs 11.9 [SD 17.5], P = .046). Complication rates were comparable (PECA: 13.2% vs META: 8.6%, P = .40). Complication rates were comparable (PECA: 13.2% vs META: 8.6%, P = .40), with different complication profiles noted between techniques. CONCLUSION: Both PECA and META techniques provide effective correction of hallux valgus deformity. The higher recurrence rate observed in the META group was associated with a significantly lower rate of pre-operative passive correctability in that cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。