Biomechanical Comparison of Monofascicular and Bifascicular Reconstruction of the Dorsal Ligaments of the Trapeziometacarpal Joint

单束与双束重建腕掌关节背侧韧带的生物力学比较

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are no studies about the biomechanical behavior of ligamentous reconstructions in the trapeziometacarpal (TM) joint. The aim of our study was to analyze the stabilizing effect of 2 different dorsoradial ligament reconstructions of the TM joint: (1) monofascicular ligament reconstruction; and (2) bifascicular ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric upper extremities were used. The dorsoradial dislocation of the thumb metacarpal (MC1) after applying a dislocating force was measured in 4 different situations using a 3-dimensional motion tracking system: (1) with the dorsoradial and ulnar ligaments intact; (2) after their section; (3) after dorsal ligament reconstruction with the bifascicular technique; and (4) after reconstruction with the monofascicular technique. The data were further analyzed and considered statistically significant at P < .05. RESULTS: The MC1 moved dorsoradially 0.36 cm (standard deviation [SD] 0.19 cm) with the intact ligaments. After sectioning the ligaments, the displacement was 0.64 cm (SD 0.24 cm). With the bifascicular technique, the MC1 moved 0.31 cm (SD 0.16 cm), and with the monofascicular technique, it moved 0.57 cm (SD 0.19 cm). CONCLUSIONS: The monofascicular reconstruction technique seems to be insufficient to stabilize the TM joint. Dorsal ligament reconstruction with the bifascicular technique restores the original stability of the TM joint. Moreover, it is not necessary to reconstruct the ulnar ligament to restore the dorsoradial stability of the TM joint after bifascicular reconstruction.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。