Abstract
Braided nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) composed of decellularized porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) were developed to achieve an appropriate balance between mechanical performance and biological compatibility for peripheral nerve repair. This study aimed to compare four SIS-braided conduits with silicone tubes in terms of bending compliance, tensile strength, swelling behavior, and cytocompatibility. SIS-braided conduit exhibited a favorable combination of flexibility, tensile strength, and dimensional stability. In vitro evaluations using PC12 and SW10 cells demonstrated that SIS-braided conduit supported neurite outgrowth and Schwann cell adhesion, confirming its favorable cytocompatibility. Based on these findings, SIS-braided conduits and silicone tubes were subsequently evaluated in a rat sciatic nerve defect model. Functional recovery assessed using the Sciatic Functional Index suggested preliminary functional recovery in the SIS-braided conduit, and histological analyses revealed evidence of axonal regeneration and myelin formation within the conduit. Overall, the results indicate that the integration of mechanical robustness with biological activity is essential for the design of nerve graft substitutes. The conduit braided from decellularized small intestinal submucosa represents a promising biodegradable alternative, a considerable biodegradable alternative to conventional non-degradable silicone conduits for peripheral nerve repair.