The anti-biofilm effect of ozonated water and super-oxidized water applied with different activation procedures against Enterococcus faecalis biofilm

采用不同活化方法处理的臭氧水和超氧化水对粪肠球菌生物膜的抗生物膜作用

阅读:2

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this in vitro study was to assess the anti-biofilm efficacy of super-oxidized water and ozonated water, activated through various methods, against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) biofilms within the root canal system. METHODS: Seventy-four single-root mandibular premolars were prepared, inoculated with E. faecalis, and incubated for 4 weeks to allow mature biofilm formation. Infected root canals were divided into 7 experimental groups (n = 10), including 3 main experimental groups consisting of activation methods (Standard needle irrigation-SNI, EndoActivator-EA, Erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet-Er: YAG laser), 2 sub-experimental groups consisting of irrigation solutions (Super-oxidized water, ozonated water) and a positive control group consisting of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Biofilm was assessed using colony-forming units (CFU) on blood agar plates. The data were statistically evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with the significance threshold set at 0.05. RESULTS: Super-oxidized water showed significantly higher anti-biofilm efficacy than ozonated water across all activation methods (p < 0.05). EA combined with super-oxidized water was more effective than Er: YAG laser (p < 0.05). Ozonated water groups showed no significant differences between activation methods (p > 0.05). NaOCl exhibited significantly higher anti-biofilm activity compared to all other groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that neither super-oxidized water nor ozonated water was capable of achieving complete bacterial elimination within the root canal system following the application of SNI, EA, or Er: YAG laser techniques. In addition, it can be concluded that the activation of super-oxidized water with EA has a remarkable anti-biofilm effect. It was found that super-oxidized water was more effective in bacterial elimination than ozonated water in all activation methods. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-026-08147-3.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。