PTSD and complex PTSD, current treatments and debates: a review of reviews

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD):当前治疗方法及争议:综述

阅读:2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were published in 2018, based on research up until that point. In this review, we summarize the current state of the evidence and discuss the findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published between 2019 and 2024. SOURCES OF DATA: We include peer-reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses published within the last 5 years. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Reviews and meta-analyses continue to support the efficacy, and cost-effectiveness, of trauma-focused psychological interventions, particularly Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Despite their demonstrated efficacy, dropout rates from psychological interventions for PTSD remain high. There has also been a rapid proliferation of research into novel interventions for treating PTSD. However, much of this research is of low quality and lacks head-to-head comparisons with established interventions. GROWING POINTS: Novel methods of delivery of established treatments are being developed, including using virtual reality, intensive forms of treatment, and digital and remote methods of delivery. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: More qualitative research to explore recipients' experiences of interventions. More good-quality research and head-to-head comparisons of treatments.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。