Understanding barriers in supporting service users with complex post-traumatic stress disorder: a pilot survey

了解支持患有复杂性创伤后应激障碍的服务对象所面临的障碍:一项试点调查

阅读:2

Abstract

Background: Experiences of complex trauma and complex post-traumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) may be associated with barriers to effective intervention for service users and providers.Objective: This investigation sought to identify barriers to intervention and support for individuals with CPTSD and their service providers.Method: A pilot survey on barriers to services for CPTSD was distributed to members of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) Complex Trauma Special Interest Group (CTSIG). A total of 28 respondents provided quantitative ratings of potential barriers to CPTSD intervention and support, and qualitative opinion based on respondents' clinical and research experience. Quantitative data underwent descriptive analyses, and qualitative data were analysed using an inductive content analysis approach.Results: The majority of potential CPTSD-related barriers in this survey were perceived as 'usually' or 'almost always' barriers for service users and providers. The results highlighted CPTSD-related stigma/misunderstanding, inability to drive systemic change, and accessibility of resources as the most significant barriers to effective CPTSD intervention faced by service providers. The main perceived barriers facing individuals with CPTSD were access to supports and services, dissatisfaction with previous intervention(s), and availability of personal and resources. Qualitative remarks indicated relevant barriers in identification and recognition of CPTSD, availability of training, treatment challenge, misdiagnosis, vulnerability due to CPTSD experiences, structural barriers, and symptom-related difficulties.Conclusion: These findings extend our understanding of expert opinion related to CPTSD intervention barriers, and offer indicative directions for future research. Extension of these results is needed to integrate the opinions of more diverse expert groups.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。