Delayed Appendectomy Versus Early Intervention: A Systematic Review of Outcomes in Complicated Appendicitis

延迟阑尾切除术与早期干预:复杂性阑尾炎预后的系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

The management of complicated appendicitis remains a subject of debate, particularly concerning the optimal timing of surgical intervention. While early appendectomy has been the traditional approach, there is growing clinical interest in delayed surgery with initial antibiotic therapy. The existing evidence, however, presents conflicting outcomes, creating uncertainty for surgeons. Therefore, the rationale for this study is to synthesize the available evidence to provide a clearer understanding of the comparative outcomes of early versus delayed surgical strategies. This systematic review aims to evaluate the outcomes of delayed versus early surgical intervention in patients with complicated appendicitis. A comprehensive search of four databases yielded 452 relevant publications. After duplicate removal using Rayyan QCRI, 162 records were screened for relevance, and 29 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, three studies met the inclusion criteria for evidence synthesis. The total pooled population was 41,274 patients (Early Surgery [ES] Group: 35,923; Delayed Surgery [LS] Group: 5,351), of whom 22,789 (55.2%) were male. The analysis revealed a nuanced tradeoff between the two approaches. Early surgery was consistently associated with a shorter overall hospital stay and lower medical costs. However, it was linked to a higher incidence of wound infections. Conversely, delayed surgery was associated with a significantly lower rate of major surgical procedures, such as ileocecectomy or right hemicolectomy, and fewer overall complications, despite sometimes resulting in a longer hospitalization. These findings highlight the complexity of decision-making in complicated appendicitis. The choice between early and delayed intervention involves balancing the risks of infection against the need for more extensive surgery. This contradiction in the literature underscores the necessity for further rigorous, prospective studies to definitively establish optimal timing and develop tailored treatment strategies that improve patient outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。