Robotic assisted TKA may allow for smaller polyethylene liner sizes compared to manual TKA with simultaneous removal of Hardware

与手动全膝关节置换术相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术可能允许使用更小的聚乙烯衬垫,并可同时移除硬件。

阅读:2

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with hardware around the knee is a challenge to preserve bone while boney landmarks are distorted. Robotic assisted (RA) TKA may assist in simultaneous hardware removal and TKA due to preoperative planning and retention of bone. The aim of this study is to identify if there are differences in component fixation, component constraint and functional outcomes dependent during simultaneous removal of hardware (ROH) around the knee and TKA comparing RA-TKA to manual. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing simultaneous ROH and TKA over a 10-year period at a single institution. Patients were required to have at least 6 months of follow up. Data extracted included surgical technique, demographics, range of motion (ROM) at 1 year, complications, need for augments and utilization of revision components. There were a total of 31 simultaneous ROH and TKA found in the EMR that met inclusion criteria including 23 manual and 8 RA-TKA with ROH. RA-TKA patients had significantly smaller poly sizes (p = 0.017). There was a trend for decreased need for augments (p = 0.544) and stems (p = 0.315) in the RA-TKA group although this was not statistically significant. Postoperative flexion (p = 0.973) or extension (p = 0.351) at 1 year did not vary. Notably, one patient in the manual revision group required a hinged knee, and one manual patient required an MUA. Patients undergoing ROH and RA-TKA had a statistically significant decrease in poly size with a trend of less revision component utilization. RA may allow for more boney preservation via CT guided preoperative planning and precise boney cuts.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。