Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation for treating two-level lumbar degenerative diseases

单侧与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定治疗双节段腰椎退行性疾病

阅读:1

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and radiological results between unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) and bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) for treating two-level lumbar degenerative diseases. The study involved 106 patients with two-level lumbar degenerative diseases. In the UPSF group (n = 52), 28 underwent intervertebral fusion (IF), 17 underwent posterolateral fusion (PLF), and 7 underwent IF & PLF. In the BPSF group (n = 54), 43 underwent IF, 2 underwent PLF, and 9 underwent IF & PLF. The clinical efficacy and radiological data were evaluated and compared. The UPSF group was significantly lower than the BPSF group regarding operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization expenses. Postoperative visual analog scale scores and oswestry disability index were significantly decreased in both groups compared with pre-surgery. At the last follow-up, the intervertebral disc height of the cranial adjacent segment decreased more in the UPSF group compared with the BPSF group. The incidence of screw loosening in the UPSF group was significantly higher compared with the BPSF group. Compared to BPSF, UPSF can achieve similar and satisfactory clinical efficacy for the treatment of two-level lumbar degenerative diseases with less operation time, muscle damage, blood loss, and hospitalization expenses. However, the occurrence of pedicle screw loosening was higher in the UPSF group.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。