Preliminary comparative evaluation of an immunofluorescence point-of-care system and central laboratory platforms for measuring cardiac biomarkers

免疫荧光即时检测系统与中心实验室平台在心脏生物标志物测量中的初步比较评价

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care testing (POCT) can accelerate clinical decision-making, but its analytical performance must be verified against central laboratory platforms before implementation. This study compared an immunofluorescence-based POCT system (STANDARD™ F Analyzer, SD Biosensor) with central laboratory analyzers used in the Clinical Laboratory of IRCCS MultiMedica (Siemens Atellica IM and CS-5100) for cardiac Troponin I (cTnI), creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), D-dimer and high-sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP). METHODS: Serum and citrate samples were tested in parallel on both systems. Analytical precision was assessed using a CLSI EP15-A3 5 × 3 design. Method comparison included Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman analysis and categorical agreement assessed by Cohen's κ at clinically relevant decision thresholds. RESULTS: A total of 217 samples were analyzed. The POCT system met predefined precision acceptance criteria for most biomarkers. Significant inter-method differences were particularly evident for CK-MB and D-dimer, whereas NT-proBNP showed smaller analytical discrepancies. hs-CRP showed acceptable categorical agreement despite limited precision performance at one control level. For cTnI, quantitative comparison at very low concentrations was limited by the higher limit of quantification of the POCT assay. Overall, categorical agreement at clinical decision thresholds ranged from moderate to high across biomarkers. CONCLUSION: The STANDARD™ F Analyzer showed variable analytical performance, with limited analytical comparability to reference methods, particularly for hs-CRP and at low cTnI concentrations. Categorical agreement was moderate overall, but clinically relevant misclassifications were observed. Therefore, the POCT platform may serve as a complementary tool in settings without immediate access to a core laboratory, provided that its analytical limitations are recognized and results are interpreted using assay-specific thresholds.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。