Type-entry-malperfusion classification in a 13-year cohort of surgically treated type A acute aortic syndromes: Impact on planning and outcomes

针对接受外科治疗的13年A型急性主动脉综合征患者队列,采用分型-入路-灌注不良分类法:对治疗方案制定和预后的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Stanford classification helps rapidly triage patients with type A acute aortic syndrome, but it overlooks key elements like proximal entry tear and malperfusion. The newer type, entry, malperfusion classification addresses these gaps to improve management. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study of all patients operated for type A acute aortic syndrome between 2010 and 2023. RESULTS: Among 334 included patients, hospital mortality was 16.5%. Entry tear was located in the ascending aorta in 69%, the arch in 19%, and the descending aorta in 3.6%. Malperfusion occurred in 75% of patients; 35% had at least 1 clinical malperfusion. Arch or distal entry tears were significantly associated with more extensive arch resections. Coronary malperfusion led to more associated procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting, reimplantation), more frequent root replacements (M1−), and greater extracorporeal life support use (M1+). Clinical malperfusions were associated with greater mortality and complication rates. Patients who were M3+ displayed the most severe multiorgan complications. CONCLUSIONS: The type, entry, malperfusion classification offers valuable preoperative insights, helping to anticipate surgical strategy and identify high-risk patients. However, its ability to differentiate malperfusion severity remains limited.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。