Clinical outcomes and biomechanics in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

保留双交叉韧带的全膝关节置换术的临床结果和生物力学

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify the influence of biomechanics on post-operative clinical outcomes in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR-TKA). METHODS: Severe medial osteoarthritis who underwent BCR-TKA were examined. Each patient was asked to perform a squat (weight-bearing [WB]) and active assisted knee flexion (non-WB [NWB]) under single fluoroscopy surveillance. A 2D-to-3D registration technique was used. Patients were divided into two groups based on their 1-year post-operative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using hierarchical cluster analysis. The rotational alignment on computed tomography, anterior stability at 30° of knee flexion, axial rotation of the femur relative to the tibial component and anteroposterior translation of the medial and lateral femorotibial contact points were measured. RESULTS: Components did not significantly differ between the groups, with 1.6 ± 5.0° and 5.4 ± 4.7° of femoral internal rotation in the low PROM (N = 28) and high PROM (N = 8) groups, respectively. Moreover, anterior stability did not significantly differ (low PROM: 4.9 ± 1.4 mm, high PROM: 5.3 ± 1.0 mm). The knee externally rotated from 0° to 70° and from 50° to 110° of flexion during WB and NWB, respectively. The low-PROM group exhibited more external rotation across all ranges of motion. Medial contact points moved backwards from 0° to 30° of flexion during WB, forward from 30° to 100° of flexion, and backwards from 100° to 110° of flexion. The low-PROM group was positioned more forward throughout the full range of motion during WB. Lateral contact points moved backwards at 0-30° of flexion, forward at 70-100° of flexion, and backwards at 100-110° of flexion during WB, while there was backward movement at 50° of flexion during NWB. Both activities exhibited a more posterior position in the low-PROM group throughout the full range of motion. CONCLUSION: The femoral component in the low-PROM group was externally rotated across all ranges of motion, and the lateral contact points were posteriorly located in BCR-TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective cohort study.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。