Abstract
About half of patients who undergo epilepsy surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy have seizure recurrence, supporting the need for approaches that more accurately identify the epileptogenic zone, defined as the brain areas whose removal causes cessation of seizures. Altered network connectivity has emerged as a candidate biomarker of the epileptogenic zone, but how connectivity is altered in the epileptogenic zone remains uncertain, with prior studies reporting inconsistent results. We hypothesized that a difference in intrinsic versus extrinsic connectivity of the epileptogenic zone may explain prior discrepant findings. We studied a multicenter cohort of adult and pediatric patients who underwent intracranial EEG recording and brain stimulation as part of epilepsy surgery planning. We measured spontaneous connectivity using Pearson correlation and perturbational connectivity using stimulation evoked potentials, modeling the connectivity according to the location of contacts in relation to the seizure onset zone (SOZ) while controlling for inter-electrode distance. We analyzed 79 patients (37 adults, 42 children). For both adult and pediatric patients, resting connectivity was higher within compared to outside the SOZ, but resting connectivity between SOZ and non-SOZ contacts was reduced. Stimulation connectivity followed a similar pattern, with elevated within-SOZ connectivity but reduced connectivity between SOZ and non-SOZ. The results support the hypothesis that the epileptogenic zone is disconnected from the rest of the brain but intrinsically hyperconnected. This result helps reconcile prior inconsistencies across studies, aligns with the results of basic science studies, and suggests that future translational work should model this heterogeneous pattern to increase the yield of using connectivity to localize the epileptogenic zone.