Abstract
Current gut microbiota studies often rely on relative quantitative sequencing. However, under certain circumstances, while the relative quantitative abundance of these bacteria may remain stable, the absolute quantities of specific bacteria can vary considerably. Since the function of bacteria is directly linked to their total numbers, absolute quantification is crucial. This study aims to identify the optimal method for microbiome analysis by comparing relative and absolute quantitative sequencing. Using ulcerative colitis, which is closely associated with gut microbiota, as a disease model and berberine (which affects microbiota) versus sodium butyrate (which does not) as drugs, relative and absolute quantitative methods were used to evaluate the varying effects of the different drugs on the regulation of gut microbiota in UC-affected animals. The regulatory effects of BBR on gut microbiota were further synthesized as identified in earlier studies using an individual-based meta-analysis, and we compared these findings with our absolute sequencing results. The results from absolute sequencing were more consistent with the actual microbial community, suggesting that relative abundance measurements might not accurately reflect the true abundance of microbial species. Moreover, meta-analysis results were only partially consistent with absolute quantitative sequencing and sometimes directly opposed, suggesting that relative quantitative sequencing analyses are prone to misinterpretation and incorrect correlation of results. This study underscores the importance of absolute quantitative analysis in accurately representing the true microbial counts in a sample and evaluating the modulatory effects of drugs on the microbiome, which plays a vital role in the study of the microbiome.