Test Performance and Clinical Utility of the Cobas Eplex Blood Culture Identification Fungal Pathogen Panel

Cobas Eplex 血培养鉴定真菌病原体检测板的检测性能和临床应用价值

阅读:2

Abstract

Identifying fungi to the genus or species level provides valuable insight for guiding antifungal therapy. We evaluated the performance and clinical utility of the Roche cobas eplex blood culture identification fungal pathogen panel (BCID-FP). Although used in fewer than 1% of patients with blood cultures drawn, BCID-FP identified fungal pathogens in more than 96% of tested samples within 72 hours. Over a 3-year period, BCID-FP demonstrated a positive percent agreement (PPA) of 91.7% compared to culture (n = 327). PPA was 100% for Candida auris, Candida kefyr, Candida krusei, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida neoformans; slightly lower for Candida albicans (90.3%) and Candida glabrata (91.1%); and lowest for Candida lusitaniae (55.6%) and Fusarium spp. (0%). To assess clinical impact, we compared patient records from preimplementation (results withheld from providers; n = 31) and postimplementation (results released; n = 68). Compared to the T2Dx Candida panel, BCID-FP showed superior accuracy (PPA 98.0% vs 61.7%). It also reduced time to fungal identification by 1.36 days relative to culture (P < .0001). Postimplementation, there was also a significant increase in infectious disease physician recommendations for antifungal deescalation (39.7% vs 16.1%; P = .0219), typically shifting from micafungin to fluconazole in C. albicans and C. parapsilosis cases. However, no significant differences were observed in time to antifungal optimization, empiric therapy duration, length of stay, or mortality. Although BCID-FP offers clear diagnostic advantages, timely implementation of expert recommendations remains essential to improving outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。