Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy for peanut, cow's milk, and hen's egg allergy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

口服免疫疗法治疗花生、牛奶和鸡蛋过敏的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising treatment for food allergies; however, safety is a concern. We synthesized evidence from the best randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on efficacy/safety of OIT for desensitization (DS) and remission (sustained unresponsiveness (SU)) in IgE mediated allergy to peanut, hen's eggs, and cow's milk. BODY: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (Until Oct 22) identifying 16 eligible RCTs published in English measuring food allergy by food challenge at the beginning and at the end of the study. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess study quality. We found 18 eligible studies. There was evidence of efficacy for DS for all allergens: peanut (RR 11.32; 95% CI 5.93, 21.60, I(2) 49%, 8 studies); hen's egg (RR 4.67; 2.66, 8.21, I(2) 0%, 5 studies); cow's milk (RR 13.98; 3.51, 55.65, I(2) 0%, 4 studies) and evidence for SU for peanut (RR 7.74; 2.90, 20.69, I(2) 0%, 3 studies) and hen's egg (RR 6.91; 1.67, 28.57, I(2) 0%, 2 studies). Allergic events were increased with intervention, and risk of adrenaline use increased for peanut RR 2.96; 1.63, 5.35, I(2) 0%, 8 studies; egg RR 1.71; 0.42, 6.92, I(2) 0%, 6 studies; and milk RR 8.45; 2.02, 35.27, I(2) 0%, 4 studies. CONCLUSION: We found strong evidence that peanut, hen's egg, and cow's milk OIT can induce DS and some evidence for remission. There was a high risk of allergic reactions. Generalizability to the entire food allergic population is not known.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。