Abstract
BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) plays a crucial role in the occurrence of heart failure (HF). This investigation was undertaken to explore the possible mechanism of MDD's involvement in HF pathogenesis and identify candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis of MDD with HF. METHODS: GWAS data for MDD and HF were collected, and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed to investigate the causal relationship between MDD and HF. Differential expression analysis (DEA) and WGCNA were used to detect HF key genes and MDD-associated secretory proteins. Protein-protein interaction (PPI), functional enrichment, and cMAP analysis were used to reveal potential mechanisms and drugs for MDD-related HF. Then, four machine learning (ML) algorithms (including GLM, RF, SVM, and XGB) were used to screen candidate biomarkers, construct diagnostic nomograms, and predict MDD-related HF. Furthermore, the MCPcounter algorithm was used to explore immune cell infiltration in HF, and MR analysis was performed to explore the causal effect of immunophenotypes on HF. Finally, the validation of the association of MDD with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the performance assessment of diagnostic biomarkers was accomplished based on animal models mimicking MDD. RESULTS: The MR analysis showed that the MDD was linked to an increased risk of HF (OR = 1.129, p < 0.001). DEA combined with WGCNA and secretory protein gene set identified 315 HF key genes and 332 MDD-associated secretory proteins, respectively. Through PPI and MCODE analysis, 78 genes were pinpointed as MDD-related pathogenic genes for HF. The enrichment analysis revealed that these genes were predominantly enriched in immune and inflammatory regulation. Through four ML algorithms, two hub genes (ISLR/SFRP4) were identified as candidate HF biomarkers, and a nomogram was developed. ROC analysis showed that the AUC of the nomogram was higher than 0.90 in both the HF combined dataset and two external cohorts. In addition, an immune cell infiltration analysis revealed the immune dysregulation in HF, with ISLR/SFRP4 displaying notable associations with the infiltration of B cells, CD8 T cells, and fibroblasts. More importantly, animal experiments showed that the expression levels of ISLR (r = -0.653, p < 0.001) and SFRP4 (r = -0.476, p = 0.008) were significantly negatively correlated with LVEF. CONCLUSIONS: The MR analysis indicated that MDD is a risk factor for HF at the genetic level. Bioinformatics analysis and the ML results suggest that ISLR and SFRP4 have the potential to serve as diagnostic biomarkers for HF. Animal experiments showed a negative correlation between the serum levels of ISLR/SFRP4 and LVEF, emphasizing the need for additional clinical studies to elucidate their diagnostic value.