Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial myocardial infarction (ATMI) have frequent cardiac and noncardiac complications. However, ATMI is uncommonly diagnosed because of its nonspecific ECG changes. Our objective was to analyze the ECG characteristics of ATMI in patients with inferior STEMI. HYPOTHESIS: Electrocardiographic P wave parameters can help in diagnosis of ATMI. METHODS: We evaluated 932 patients who underwent coronary angiography and recruited 39 patients with ATMI and 33 patients without ATMI with inferior STEMI for a retrospective study. Twelve-lead ECGs were obtained to measure P-wave parameters in diagnosis of ATMI. P-wave parameters and PR-segment displacement were compared in patients with and without ATMI. RESULTS: In inferior leads, PWD and PWDisp were significantly longer in the ATMI group than in the non-ATMI group (limb lead II, 109.79 ±15.51 ms and 86.65 ±5.02 ms, respectively; P < 0.001; limb lead III, 108.31 ±12.51 ms and 85.27 ±7.47 ms, P < 0.001; aVF, 106.49 ±13.68 ms and 83.01 ±7.89 ms, P < 0.001; PWDisp, 41.67 ±10.72 ms and 25.18 ±5.17 ms, P < 0.001). By contrast, PWA was significantly lower in the ATMI group than in the non-ATMI group (limb lead II, 0.96 ±0.18 mV and 1.39 ±0.22 mV, respectively; P < 0.001; limb lead III, 0.90 ±0.11 and 1.21 ±0.23, P < 0.001; aVF, 0.88 ±0.17 and 1.26 ±0.28, P < 0.001). PR-segment displacement was found in 8 (20.5%) patients with ATMI. A PWD ≥95.5 ms in lead DII diagnosed ATMI with a higher sensitivity and specificity (90%, 94%) than did PWA or PWDisp. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests P-wave parameters might be considered ECG findings in diagnosis of ATMI in patients with inferior STEMI.