Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess the agreement and performance of visual transient elastography (ViTE), sound touch elastography (STE), and sound touch quantification (STQ) for liver fibrosis staging using transient elastography (TE) as a standard. We finally enrolled 252 subjects with chronic liver disease (CLD) who underwent ViTE, STE, STQ, and TE examinations simultaneously in our hospital from October 2022 to July 2023. We evaluated the correlation and agreement between various technologies. And also evaluated the performances and optimal cutoffs of ViTE, STE, and STQ . The correlation coefficients of ViTE and TE, STE and TE, STQ and TE were 0.863, 0.709, and 0.727, respectively. The ICC among ViTE, STE, STQ, and TE was 0.911. The area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROCs) of ViTE, STE, and STQ for detection of TE of ≥5 kPa, ≥10 kPa, ≥15 kPa, and ≥20 kPa were 0.867, 0.771, 0.804; 0.972, 0.935, 0.933; 0.998, 0.973, 0.968; and 1.000, 0.960, 0.954, respectively. The AUROCs of ViTE for detection of lower stages (TE≥5 kPa and ≥10 kPa) were significantly higher than STE and STQ in the overall cohort (ViTE vs. STE: Z = 2.766, for TE ≥5 kPa; ViTE vs. STE: Z = 2.145, ; ViTE vs. STQ: Z = 2.587, for TE ≥10 kPa) (all P < 0.05). These methods all have coincided with performance in more advanced stages (TE ≥15 kPa and ≥20 kPa) (all P > 0.05). These methods showed excellent correlation and agreement. ViTE performance in more advanced fibrosis differentiation is comparable to the STE and STQ while ViTE is more accurate than STE and STQ to identify patients with mild CLD stage, and can more effectively rule out compensated advanced CLD.