Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Is Associated With Similar Functional Outcomes for Male and Female Runners With Patellar or Quadriceps Tendinopathy: A Pilot Investigation

体外冲击波疗法对患有髌骨或股四头肌腱病的男性和女性跑步者具有相似的功能性疗效:一项初步研究

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To characterize functional outcomes in runners with patellar tendinopathy (PT) and quadriceps tendinopathy (QT) following extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and explore differences in response by tendinopathy (PT or QT) and by sex (female or male). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of runners with PT or QT treated with ESWT (radial or combined radial and focused) at a single sports medicine clinic during a 5-year period. Individuals were included if they had a primary diagnosis of PT or QT, self-identified as a runner, and had complete baseline and final functional outcome questionnaires for ESWT with treatment duration defined by response based on best practices. Functional outcome at baseline and following treatment were assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Patellar Tendon questionnaires. Treatment success was defined as meeting the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of ≥13 points. RESULTS: Of the 19 runners included, 26% identified as female and 74% as male; all runners identified as cisgendered. There were 12 runners with PT (17% female, 83% male) and 7 with QT (43% female, 57% male). Median follow-up was 3.0 months (range, 1.0-23.0; interquartile range, 3.0-6.0). Of all runners, 67% with PT and 71% with QT achieved MCID with no significant difference between tendinopathy groups (P = .90). There was also no difference in the percentage that achieved MCID between sexes, with 80% of women and 64% of men meeting MCID (P = .72). CONCLUSIONS: Similar functional outcomes were observed in female and male runners with QT or PT following radial and combined ESWT, with most achieving MCID. This study suggests that ESWT, in combination with physical therapy, may be an effective treatment for runners with PT or QT and that ESWT could be considered for PT or QT refractory to physical therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。