Comparative Evaluation of Different Alveolar Ridge Width Measurement Techniques in Dental Implant Treatment Planning: An in Vivo Observational Non-Interventional Study

牙种植治疗计划中不同牙槽嵴宽度测量技术的比较评价:一项体内观察性非干预研究

阅读:1

Abstract

In todays era dental implant has become the dependable therapeutic treatment for the replacement of missing teeth. The success of dental implants depends not only on osteointegration of the implant but also on the surrounding hard and soft tissue. Presurgical evaluation of alveolar ridge width and height is of paramount important for implant placement. There are several methods to evaluate the alveolar ridge width and height such as ridge mapping and CBCT. This study included 30 sites from 8 patients in the age ranging from 30 to 65 years. A stent was prepared and the width of the alveolar ridge was estimated employing the following techniques: Group I: Measurement of alveolar ridge width on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) method, group II: Measurement of alveolar ridge width by ridge mapping technique, group III: Measurement of alveolar ridge width by surgical exposure. The minimum value for ridge mapping with caliper is 2 and maximum value is 9 with mean 4.5667 ± 1.63335 with standard error 0.29821. The minimum value for Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is 1.80 and maximum value is 9.30 with mean 4.6233 ± 1.67119 with standard error 0.30512. The minimum value for direct intrasurgical measurement with caliper is 2 and maximum value is 9 with mean 4.2000 ± 1.58441 with standard error 0.28927. Cone beam computed tomography could also be used to measure the ridge width accurately. Apart from measurement of alveolar ridge dimensions it had multiple other uses and thus can be advised as per requirement of the clinician.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。