Efficacy and safety of denosumab compared with conventional medications in the treatment of osteoporosis: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

地诺单抗与传统药物治疗骨质疏松症的疗效和安全性比较:一项基于试验序贯分析的荟萃分析

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab versus conventional medications in treating osteoporosis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials from PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP were searched via the web from the onset to April 2025. RevMan 5.4 software was used for performing a systematic review. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) of serious adverse events (SAEs) was performed using TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies with 16,437 patients were included. Compared to the control group (conventional medications), the experimental group with denosumab showed no significant difference in increasing total hip bone mineral density (BMD) (mean difference [MD] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.00-0.06], P = .06) and femoral neck BMD (MD = 0.02, 95% CI = [-0.04 to 0.08], P = .43), but it significantly improved lumbar spine BMD (MD = 0.07, 95% CI = [0.03-0.11], P = .003). In addition, there were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of reducing osteonecrosis of the jaw (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49, 95% CI = [0.65-3.46], P = .35), atypical fractures (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = [0.38-8.31], P = .47), AEs (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = [0.91-1.07], P = .71), and SAEs (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = [0.53-1.69], P = .85), and TSA showed an insufficient information size with SAEs of denosumab compared with conventional medications in the treatment of osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that denosumab can improve lumbar spine BMD compared with conventional medications for osteoporosis; furthermore, no evidence was found that the denosumab had a significantly higher incidence of SAEs than the control group and it is safe to apply. However, given the potential bias of the included studies, more high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this conclusion further and to provide a more reliable basis for the use of medication in the clinical treatment of osteoporosis. The registration number in PROSPERO is CRD420251051061 (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。