Beyond facial injury: prognostic utility of maxillofacial trauma scores in the emergency department

面部损伤之外:颌面创伤评分在急诊科的预后价值

阅读:1

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic utility of two widely used maxillofacial trauma scoring systems (MFTSs) -the Facial Injury Severity Score (FISS) and Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score (MFISS)- in adult multiple trauma patients in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in the ED of a tertiary care hospital between 01.08.2020 and 01.08.2021. A total of 124 MFT patients aged ≥ 18 years with at least one concomitant injury to another organ system were included. FISS and MFISS were calculated for each patient. The associations between scores and coexisting injuries, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mortality were analyzed. Predictive performance for mortality was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Higher FISS scores were significantly associated with intracranial injuries, including subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), cranial fractures, and pneumocephalus (all p < 0.01), as well as with pneumothorax, rib fractures, ICU admission, and mortality (all p ≤ 0.004). MFISS scores were significantly higher in patients with SAH, while a negative association was observed between MFISS and abdominal injuries (p = 0.043). ROC analysis demonstrated good predictive performance for mortality, with areas under the curve of 0.820 for FISS and 0.758 for MFISS (both p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: FISS and MFISS are associated with clinically meaningful outcomes and may serve as practical tools for early risk stratification and prognostic assessment in the ED among adult multiple trauma patients with maxillofacial injuries.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。