Time-zero stability of uncemented standard versus intermediate revision stems after extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO): a biomechanical study

股骨大转子截骨术后,非骨水泥标准型与中间型翻修型假体柄的初始稳定性:一项生物力学研究

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This time-zero biomechanical study investigates femoral stem stability after extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) without fragment refixation, representing a worst-case scenario. ETO is used in complex femoral revisions to improve exposure while preserving soft tissue and neurovascular structures. In the setting of a short ETO, surgeons may choose between standard (STD) and intermediate revision (REV) stems, although their primary stability remains unclear. Clinically, STD are still used after short ETO with low rates of aseptic loosening, aiming for proximal bone loading to reduce stress shielding. We therefore hypothesized that STD would demonstrate non-inferior axial and torsional stability compared with REV in a short open ETO model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A biomechanical model using SYNBONE(®) femurs and uncemented, collared, fully coated triple-tapered STD and REV 135° CCD was established. A standardized 60 mm ETO (vastus ridge to distal end of ETO) was performed and left unrepaired to simulate a worst-case scenario. Four groups (n = 6 each) were tested: (1) STD and (2) REV under axial loading (500 cycles at 20° adduction up to 500 N at 1 Hz, then static loading to failure), and (3) STD and (4) REV under torsional loading (500 cycles up to 10Nm internal rotation at 1 Hz, then failure testing). Axial stiffness (N/mm), torsional stiffness (Nm/deg), and failure load/torque were assessed. RESULTS: REV showed higher axial stiffness (297.5 ± 39.7 N/mm) than STD (245.9 ± 33.2 N/mm, p = 0.035) and greater axial failure load (1228.1 ± 86.8 vs. 1002.5 ± 114.1 N, p = 0.003). Torsional stiffness and peak torque were comparable between groups. Axial failure with REV occurred at the distal stem tip, while STD fractured through the ETO. Torsional failure produced spiral fractures from the distal ETO in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Under time-zero worst-case conditions without ETO refixation, the REV demonstrated higher axial stability, while torsional stability was comparable. The STD provided sufficient primary stability after short open ETO, supporting its potential use when revision stem implantation is not required.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。