Does simplification signify compromise? Evaluation of different universal adhesives on shear bond strength: in vitro study

简化是否意味着妥协?不同通用粘合剂剪切粘接强度的体外评价

阅读:2

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Universal adhesives are widely used in the field of dental prosthetics owing to their broad applicability and clinical convenience. This study aims to evaluate the bonding performance of four adhesives on zirconia and resin material surfaces. METHODS: The shear bond strength (SBS) test results of four adhesives including Single Bond Universal Adhesive (3M1), Scotchbond™ Universal Plus Adhesive (3M2), PALFIQUE UNIVERSAL BOND (TK1) and BONDMER Lightless II (TK2) were studied (n = 10 per adhesive per storage condition) under three storage conditions: constant-temperature water storage at 37 °C for 24 h, 5,000 thermal cycles, and 10,000 thermal cycles. Three-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD test, and Games-Howell test were performed on the outcome data (α = 0.05). The Adhesive Remnant Index was used to evaluate the debonding condition between resin and zirconia surfaces. RESULTS: All four groups exhibited acceptable bond strength measured at 24 h in a 37 °C constant-temperature water bath and significant differences were observed among the four groups (p < 0.05). After thermal cycling, the bond strength of all groups showed significant decline, with only TK1 yielding detectable data. Three-way ANOVA results indicated that all factors-storage conditions (p < 0.001), brands (p < 0.05), and generations (p < 0.05)-exerted significant effects on SBS. At the same time, significant differences were observed between the interaction among the three factors (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The bonding performance of universal adhesives of different generations and brands is material-dependent. After 5,000 thermal cycles, the SBS differed significantly among brands and generations of adhesives, with TK1 exhibiting better performance in this study. Technological advances have introduced user-friendly products with simplified application procedures. However, clinicians should adopt an evidence-based perspective and focus on clinical effect and experimental data of materials.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。