Abstract
Embryo adoption has emerged as one of the most contested questions in contemporary Catholic bioethics, arising from the widespread practice of embryo cryopreservation associated with in vitro fertilization. While the Church affirms without qualification the full dignity of every human embryo, it has not judged embryo adoption to be a morally licit response, and it states that the situation of abandoned embryos cannot be resolved through proposals of embryo transfer. This article argues that such restraint reflects moral coherence rather than indecision. Drawing on magisterial teaching, Thomistic moral analysis, and ecclesial considerations, the article examines embryo adoption through the lens of the moral object of procreation. It first analyzes cryopreservation as an expression of a disordered anthropology that fragments embodiment and temporality, thereby constraining later moral options. It then evaluates embryo adoption as an act that initiates pregnancy apart from the marital act, concluding that neither benevolent intention nor tragic circumstance alters its moral species. The article further engages common Catholic defenses of embryo adoption, assesses the risks of moral confusion and scandal in ecclesial witness, and considers pastoral care for infertility within the limits of licit action. By distinguishing the unconditional dignity of children from the moral evaluation of acts, the article contends that embryo adoption represents a tragic limit rather than a moral solution. The Church's hesitation thus bears witness to a vision of human procreation grounded in marriage, embodiment, and moral truth, even amid unresolved suffering.