Distal Phalanx Depth Variation and Implications for Zone I Flexor Tendon Anchor Repairs: A CT and X-Ray Comparative Study

远端指骨深度变异及其对I区屈肌腱锚钉修复的影响:CT和X线对比研究

阅读:3

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Suture anchors in Zone I flexor tendon repairs risk dorsal cortex penetration and nail bed disruption. Preoperative measurements guide safe anchor-drill selection, yet the accuracy of radiograph-based measurements and optimal safety thresholds remain unclear. This study quantified distal phalanx depths, verified radiograph measurements with computed tomography (CT) scans, and assessed compatibility with commercially available anchor systems. METHODS: Thirty adult subjects (120 digits) with paired lateral radiographs and CT scans of the same hand were retrospectively reviewed. Oblique and perpendicular depths at the distal phalanx base were measured independently by 2 reviewers on both imaging modalities and statistically analyzed. Safe depth thresholds were calculated and compared with specifications for 5 commercially available anchor systems. Male and female digits were compared. RESULTS: Radiographs slightly overestimated CT (mean bias ≤ 0.6 mm) but showed a largely linear and predictable relationship. Maximum safe depths ranged from 3.8 mm in the little finger to 4.9 mm in the index, increasing to 4.6 to 5.9 mm with oblique drilling. Several anchor systems exceeded these limits, particularly in ring and little fingers. CONCLUSIONS: Digital radiographs provide sufficiently accurate measurements for most clinical scenarios with the use of a modest safety margin. Distal phalanx size varies by digit and gender, warranting added caution in female patients and in ring and little fingers. Our findings support routine consideration of retrograde oblique drilling techniques to optimize bone purchase and reduce the risk of dorsal cortex penetration.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。